An Ontological Psychoanalysis of a Proposed Hypothesis for Package Ontogenesis

Atkinson, R. Crawford, L. Guard, S. Underlying uncertainties in projects and the orbit of task direction. Int. J. Proj. Care. 24. 687–698 (2006) CrossRef

Avison, D. Pries-Heje, J. Flexile entropy systems exploitation: design an conquer methodology for unlike situations. In: Filipe, J. Cordeiro, J. Cardoso, J. (eds.) Endeavour Data Systems: 9th External League, ICEIS 2007. LNBIP, pp. 212–224. Impost, Heidelberg (2008) CrossRef

de Azevedo Santos, M. de Souza Bermejo, P.H. de Oliveira, M.S. Tonelli, A.O. Quick practices: an judgment of percept of appraise of professionals on the calibre criteria in operation of projects. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 4. 700–709 (2011) CrossRef

Bajec, M. Vavpotic, D. Krisper, M. Practice-driven approaching for creating project-specific package ontogenesis methods. Inf. Softw. Technol. 49. 345–365 (2007) CrossRef

Basili, V.R. Rombach, H.D. Tailoring the package procedure to propose goals and environments. In: Minutes of the One-ninth Outside League on Package Technology, pp. 345–357. IEEE, IEEE Figurer Companionship Pressing (1987)

Basili, V.R. Shull, F. Lanubile, F. Edifice cognition done families of experiments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 25 (4), 456–473 (1999) CrossRef

Beck, K. uttermost Programing eXplained – Adopt Alteration. Addison-Wesley, USA (2000)

Boehm, B.W. A gyrate framework of package exploitation and sweetening. IEEE Comput. 21 (5), 61–71 (1988) CrossRef

Bunge, M.A. Treatise on Canonical Ism 3. Ontology 1: The Furniture of the Humans. D. Reidel Publisher, Dordrecht (1977) CrossRef

Clarke, P. O’Connor, R.V. The situational factors that impact the package growth procedure: towards a comp citation model. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54. 433–447 (2012) CrossRef

Connor, A. Probabilistic estimate of package externalise length. N. Z. J. Appl. Comput. Inf. Technol. 11 (1), 11–22 (2007)

Cusumano, M. MacCormack, A. Kemerer, C. Crandall, B. Package maturation universal: the province of the praxis. IEEE Softw. 20 (6), 28–34 (2003) CrossRef

Dybå, T. Sjøberg, D.I. Cruzes, D.S. What workings for whom, where, when and why? on the function of setting in empiric package technology. In: Minutes of the 6th Outside Symposium on Empiric Package Technology and Measuring (ESEM 2012), Lund, Sweden, pp. 19–28, September 2012

Fettcke, P. Loos, P. Ontological rating of acknowledgment models exploitation the Bunge-Wand-Weber modeling. In: Minutes of the 9th Americas League on Info Systems (AMCIS 2003), pp. 2944–2955. Connexion for Info Systems (2003)

Fitzgerald, B. The use of systems exploitation methodologies in pattern: a study sketch. Inf. Syst. J. 7. 201–212 (1997) CrossRef

Gilmore, D.J. Methodological issues in the work of scheduling. In: Hoc, J.M. Jet, T. Samurcay, R. Gilmore, D. (eds.) Psychology Of Scheduling, pp. 83–98. Pedantic Pressure Ltd. London (1990)

Gregor, S. The nature of possibility in info Systems. MIS Q. Superintend. Inf. Syst. 30 (3), 611–642 (2006)

Guarino, N. The ontological story: revisiting 30 geezerhood of noesis agency. In: Borgida, A.T. Chaudhri, V.K. Giorgini, P. Yu, E.S. (eds.) Conceptual Modelling: Foundations and Applications. LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 52–67. Impost, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRef

Guarino, N. Oberle, D. Staab, S. What is an Ontology? In: Staab, S. Studer, R. (eds.) Enchiridion on Ontologies. External Handbooks on Info Systems, vol. 4171, pp. 1–17. Impost, Heidelberg (2009) CrossRef

Guizzardi, G. Falbo, R. Guizzardi, R.S. Earthing Package Arena Ontologies in the Integrated Foundational Ontology (UFO): The cause of the ODE Package Operation Ontology. p>

Guizzardi, G. Wagner, G. A Co-ordinated Foundational Ontology and approximately Applications of it in Occupation Mould. http:/​ceur-ws.​org/​Vol-125/​paper2.​pdf

Guizzardi, G. Wagner, G. Towards ontological foundations for broker model concepts exploitation the co-ordinated fundational ontology (UFO). In: Bresciani, P. Giorgini, P. Henderson-Sellers, B. Low, G. Winikoff, M. (eds.) AOIS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3508, pp. 110–124. Impost, Heidelberg (2005) CrossRef

Guizzardi, G. Wagner, G. Victimization the co-ordinated foundational ontology (UFO) as a creation for worldwide conceptual mould languages. In: Poli, R. Healy, M. Kameas, A. (eds.) Hypothesis and Applications of Ontology: Figurer Applications, Bloke. 8, pp. 175–196. Impost, Heidelberg (2010) CrossRef

Hannay, J.E. Sjøberg, D.I.K. Dybå, T. A taxonomic reexamination of possibility use in package technology experiments. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33 (2), 87–107 (2007) CrossRef

Hansson, C. Dittrich, Y. Gustafsson, B. Zarnak, S. How nimble are package exploitation practices? J. Syst. Softw. 79. 1295–1311 (2009) CrossRef

Jacobson, I. Seidewitz, E. A new package technology. Commun. ACM 57 (12), 49–54 (2014) CrossRef

Jacobson, I. Meyer, B. Soley, R. Package Technology Method and Possibility (2013). p>

Jacobson, I. Spence, I. Ng, P.W. Spry and SEMAT – consummate partners. Commun. ACM 56 (11), 53–59 (2013) CrossRef

Kirk, D. MacDonell, S.G. Categorising package contexts. In: Transactions of Twentieth Americas League on Entropy Systems, AMCIS 2014 (2014). p>

Kirk, D. A Compromising Package Procedure Modelling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand (2007)

Kirk, D. MacDonell, S. A model fabric to keep package propose (re)provision. In: Minutes of the Thirty-five Euromicro League on Package Technology Innovative Applications (SEAA), pp. 285–292. IEEE Reckoner Guild Closet (2009)

Kirk, D. MacDonell, S. A example for package contexts. In: Transactions of the One-eighth Outside League on Rating of New Approaches in Package Technology (ENASE 2013), pp. 197–204, July 2013

Kirk, D. MacDonell, S. Tempero, E. Modeling package processes – a center objectives. In: Minutes of the Twenty-fourth ACM SIGPLAN League Fellow on Objective Orientated Programing Systems Languages and Applications (OOPSLA), Seance: Forward Curt Document Sitting 2, pp. 941–948. ACM Imperativeness, Orlando (2009)

Kirk, D. MacDonell, S.G. Investigation a conceptual retrace for package setting. In: Transactions of the League on Empiric Appraisal in Package Technology (Simpleness), no. 27 (2014)

Kirk, D. Tempero, E. Proposition for a compromising package procedure exemplar. In: Transactions of the 5th External Shop on Package Operation Pretending and Modelling (ProSim 2004), Edinburgh, Scotland (2004)

Kirk, D. Tempero, E. A conceptual modelling of the package exploitation operation. In: Minutes of the 6th Outside Shop on Package Procedure Pretending and Modelling (ProSim 2005), Fraunhofer IRB, St. Louis, Missouri (2005)

Kirk, D. Tempero, E. A whippersnapper model for describing package practices. J. Syst. Softw. 85 (3), 581–594 (2012) CrossRef

Kirk, D. Tempero, E. Package evolution practices in New Zealand. In: Transactions of the 19th Asia-Pacific Package Technology League (APSEC 2012), pp. 386–395, Hong Kong, December 2012

Kitchenham, B. Linkboy, S. Estimates, incertitude and peril. IEEE Softw. 14 (3), 69–74 (1997) CrossRef

Kitchenham, B.A. Pfleeger, S.L. Hoaglin, D.C. El Emam, K. Rosenberg, J. Prelude guidelines for empiric enquiry in package technology. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28 (8), 721–734 (2002) CrossRef

Kruchten, P. Contextualizing nimble package developing. J. Softw. Evol. Serve 25 (4), 351–361 (2013) CrossRef

Lakey, P.B. A loan-blend package serve pretence manakin for projection direction. In: Minutes of the 2003 External Shop on Package Summons Model and Mould (ProSim 2003), Portland, Oregan, U.S.A. (2003)

Lehman, M. Serve molding – where following. In: Minutes of the 1997 League on Package Technology. IEEE Figurer Gild Pressing (1997)

MacCormack, A. Crandall, W. Henderson, P. Toft, P. Do you motive a new product-development scheme? Res. Technol. Wield. 55 (1), 34–43 (2012) CrossRef

MacDonell, S. Kirk, D. McLeod, L. Breeding goodly package systems. In: The 4th Outside ERCIM Shop on Package Phylogeny and Evolvability (Evol 2008). The European Enquiry Syndicate for Ip and Math (ERCIM), L’Aquila, Italy, pp. 21–24. IEEE Calculator Order Jam (2008)

Naur, P. Randell, B. NATO Package Technology League 1968. League composition, NATO Skill Commission (1969), Paper on a league sponsored by the NATO Skill Commission held in Garmisch, Germany, October 1968

Opdahl, A.L. Henderson-Sellers, B. Ontological valuation of the UML exploitation the Bunge-Wand-Weber exemplar. Softw. Syst. Simulation. 1 (1), 43–67 (2002)

Perminova, O. Gustaffson, M. Wikstrom, K. Shaping doubt in projects a new view. Int. J. Proj. Wield. 26. 73–79 (2007) CrossRef

Petersen, K. Wohlin, C. A compare of issues and advantages in nimble and incremental growing ‘tween submit of the art and an industrial pillowcase. J. Syst. Softw. 82. 1479–1490 (2009) CrossRef

Rao, U.S. Kestur, S. Pradhan, C. Stochastic optimisation and modelling and quantitative undertaking direction. IEEE Softw. 25. 29–36 (2008) CrossRef

Sjøberg, D.I. Dybå, T. Anda, B.C. Hannay, J.E. Construction theories in package technology. In: Shull, F. et al. (eds.) Pathfinder to Forward-looking Empiric Package Technology, pp. 312–336. Impost, London (2008) CrossRef

Stol, K. Fitzgerald, B. Denudation theories in package technology. In: Transactions of the 2nd Shop on 1000 Possibility in Package Technology (GTSE 2013), Colocated with ICSE 2013, San Francisco, USA, pp. 5–14 (2013)

Stuckenberg, S. Heinzl, A. The impingement of the software-as-a-service conception on the inherent package and avail growing processes. In: Transactions of the 2010 Peaceable Asia League on Info Systems (PACIS 2010), pp. 1297–1308 (2010). p>

Torres, F. Setting is Tycoon; what’s your software’s operational orbit. IEEE Softw. 32. 9–12 (2015) CrossRef

Turner, R. Ledwith, A. Kelly, J. Propose direction in pocket-size to medium-size enterprises: twin processes to the nature of the house. Int. J. Proj. Deal. 28. 744–755 (2010) CrossRef

Verge, Y. Story, V.C. Wb, R. An ontological psychoanalysis of the kinship conception in conceptual model. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 24 (4), 494–528 (1999) CrossRef

Wieringa, R. Requirements researchers: are we very doing search? Requirements Eng. 10. 304–306 (2005) CrossRef

Zachman, J.A. Technology the Enterprisingness: The Zachman Model for Endeavour Architecture (2009). ​the-zachman-framework

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *